Riggins v. Nevada: Defendants Don't Have to Take Antipsychotic Drugs During Trial

Riggins v. Nevada: Defendants Don't Have to Take Antipsychotic Drugs During Trial

Riggins v. Nevada

Timeline of History

History Topics
Countries

Decided: Riggins v. Nevada - In a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court overturns David Riggins' murder conviction because during this trial the state forced him to take antipsychotic drugs. This impaired his ability to testify on his own behalf.

According to the Court, defendants' constitutional rights would be protected so long as any medication they are forced to take is the "least intrusive" means for providing for competence and if the treament is "medically appropriate" for protecting both the defendants' safety as well as the safety of others.

Powered by JReviews

Today's Major Events

Prince v. Massachusetts: Court Upholds Restriction on Children Selling Religious Literature
Israeli Government Votes to Annex Golan Heights
Birth of Tycho Brahe, Danish Alchenist and Last of the Naked-Eye Astronomers
Judas Maccabaeus Restores Temple in Jerusalem, Establishing Festival of Hanukkah

May History Calendar