Riggins v. Nevada: Defendants Don't Have to Take Antipsychotic Drugs During Trial

Riggins v. Nevada: Defendants Don't Have to Take Antipsychotic Drugs During Trial

Riggins v. Nevada

Timeline of History

History Topics
Countries

Decided: Riggins v. Nevada - In a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court overturns David Riggins' murder conviction because during this trial the state forced him to take antipsychotic drugs. This impaired his ability to testify on his own behalf.

According to the Court, defendants' constitutional rights would be protected so long as any medication they are forced to take is the "least intrusive" means for providing for competence and if the treament is "medically appropriate" for protecting both the defendants' safety as well as the safety of others.

Powered by JReviews

Today's Major Events

Bishop Ehrenfried: Unite Totalitarianism of Church and State
Hitler Reassures Industrialists and Corporate Leaders at Secret Meeting
Senator Joe McCarthy: Some State Department Employees Are Communist Spies
Pro-Nazi Rally at Madison Square Garden Draws More Than 20,000

February History Calendar

May History Calendar