Murdock v. Pennsylvania: License for Solicitors is an Unconstitutional Tax

Murdock v. Pennsylvania: License for Solicitors is an Unconstitutional Tax

Murdock v. Pennsylvania

Timeline of History

History Topics
Religious History
Countries

Decided: Murdock v. Pennsylvania — The U.S. Supreme Court rules 5-4 that a Jeanette ordinance requiring solicitors to purchase a license from the borough is an unconstitutional tax on the Jehovah's Witnesses' right to freely exercise their religion.

Justice William O. Douglas writes in the majority opinion:

"We do not mean to say that religious groups and the press are free from all financial burdens of government. ...

We only hold that spreading one's religious beliefs or preaching the Gospel through distribution of religious literature and through personal visitations is an age-old type of evangelism with as high a claim to constitutional protection as the more orthodox types."

Read More: Murdock v. Pennsylvania

User comments

There are no user comments for this item.

Ratings (the higher the better)
Interesting
Comment
    Please enter the security code.
 
 
Powered by JReviews

Today's Major Events

Evacuation of British, French, and Belgian Forces Begins at Dunkirk
Pope Gregory IX Begins Medieval Inquisition in Aragon
IBM Wins Contract for Prussian Census, Will Help Make Holocaust Posible
Joseph Lewis Files Lawsuit to Stop Bible Readings & Hymns in Public Schools
Bishop Michael Rackl Links Being a Good Catholic With Being a Patriotic German