Jones v. Opelika: Fee for Distributing Literature is Unconstitutional

Jones v. Opelika: Fee for Distributing Literature is Unconstitutional

Jones v. Opelika II

Timeline of History

History Topics
Religious History
Countries

Decided: Jones v. Opelika II — The U.S. Supreme Court will rule the practice of charging a flat fee for people distributing literature is unconstitutional. The freedom of press is not to be restricted only to those who can afford to pay the licensing fee.

Justice William O. Douglas writes in the majority opinion:

"The mere fact that the religious literature is 'sold' by itinerant preachers rather than 'donated' does not transform evangelism into a commercial enterprise. If it did, then the passing of the collection plate in church would make the church service a commercial project."

User comments

There are no user comments for this item.

Ratings (the higher the better)
Interesting
Comment
    Please enter the security code.
 
 
Powered by JReviews

Today's Major Events

Evacuation of British, French, and Belgian Forces Begins at Dunkirk
Pope Gregory IX Begins Medieval Inquisition in Aragon
IBM Wins Contract for Prussian Census, Will Help Make Holocaust Posible
Joseph Lewis Files Lawsuit to Stop Bible Readings & Hymns in Public Schools
Bishop Michael Rackl Links Being a Good Catholic With Being a Patriotic German