Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls: Employers Can't Exclude Women from Hazardous Jobs

Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls: Employers Can't Exclude Women from Hazardous Jobs


Timeline of History

History Topics
Countries

Decided: Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, Inc - The Supreme Court rules unanimously that employers cannot exclude women of childbearing age from well-paying but hazardous jobs based on a purported desire to protect a hypothetical fetus. This has been a common policy in many industries which leads to significant inequality for women in pay and promotion.

In this particular case, Johnson Controls has been excluding all fertile women, but no fertile men, from jobs where they might be exposed to lead toxins.

According to the Supreme Court's decision:

"Concern for a woman's existing or potential offspring historically has been the excuse for denying women equal employment opportunities. Congress in the PDA prohibited discrimination on the basis of a woman's ability to become pregnant. We do no more than hold that the PDA means what it says."

User comments

There are no user comments for this item.

Ratings (the higher the better)
Interesting
Comment
    Please enter the security code.
 
 
Powered by JReviews

Today's Major Events

Buddhists Believe Buddha's Spirit Freed Under Sacred Bodhi Tree
ACLU v. Black Horse: Court Rules Students Can't Vote on Having Graduation Prayers
Pope Pius VIII Condemns Treating Catholicism Like Other Religions
Turks Launch Successful Assault on Fort Saint Elmo at Siege of Malta
Bob Jones v. U.S.: Racially Discriminatory Religious Schools Don't Deserve Tax Exempt Status