Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls: Employers Can't Exclude Women from Hazardous Jobs

Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls: Employers Can't Exclude Women from Hazardous Jobs


Timeline of History

History Topics
Countries

Decided: Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, Inc - The Supreme Court rules unanimously that employers cannot exclude women of childbearing age from well-paying but hazardous jobs based on a purported desire to protect a hypothetical fetus. This has been a common policy in many industries which leads to significant inequality for women in pay and promotion.

In this particular case, Johnson Controls has been excluding all fertile women, but no fertile men, from jobs where they might be exposed to lead toxins.

According to the Supreme Court's decision:

"Concern for a woman's existing or potential offspring historically has been the excuse for denying women equal employment opportunities. Congress in the PDA prohibited discrimination on the basis of a woman's ability to become pregnant. We do no more than hold that the PDA means what it says."

User comments

There are no user comments for this item.

Ratings (the higher the better)
Interesting
Comment
    Please enter the security code.
 
 
Powered by JReviews

Today's Major Events

Britain Suspends Provincial Government, Takes Control of Northern Ireland
Roman Emperors Renew Restrictions on Christian Heretics
Segregationist Leander H. Perez Attacks Archbishop Rummel Over Desegregation Order
Inquisitor-General Tomas Torquemada Recommends All Jews be Expelled from Spain
David Waters Sentenced for Murders of Madalyn Murray O'Hair and Family