Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls: Employers Can't Exclude Women from Hazardous Jobs

Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls: Employers Can't Exclude Women from Hazardous Jobs


Timeline of History

History Topics
Countries

Decided: Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, Inc - The Supreme Court rules unanimously that employers cannot exclude women of childbearing age from well-paying but hazardous jobs based on a purported desire to protect a hypothetical fetus. This has been a common policy in many industries which leads to significant inequality for women in pay and promotion.

In this particular case, Johnson Controls has been excluding all fertile women, but no fertile men, from jobs where they might be exposed to lead toxins.

According to the Supreme Court's decision:

"Concern for a woman's existing or potential offspring historically has been the excuse for denying women equal employment opportunities. Congress in the PDA prohibited discrimination on the basis of a woman's ability to become pregnant. We do no more than hold that the PDA means what it says."

User comments

There are no user comments for this item.

Ratings (the higher the better)
Interesting
Comment
    Please enter the security code.
 
 
Powered by JReviews

Today's Major Events

Operation Barbarossa, Invasion of Soviet Union, is Launched by Nazi Germany
Second Armistice at Compiègne Signed Between Germany and Remains of French Government
ACLU Will Try to Raise $10,000 for Defense of John Scopes for Teaching Evolution
Birth of Erich Marie Remarque, Author of All Quiet On The Western Front
Freuds's General Introduction to Psychoanalysis is First Published in U.S.