Follett v. Town of McCornick: Distributing Religious Materials Doesn't Require a License

Timeline of History

History Topics
Religious History
Countries

Decided: Follett v. Town of McCormick - The Supreme Court will rule that people who earn a living buy selling or otherwise distributing religious materials should not be required to pay the same licensing fees that are required of those who sell secular materials.

Justice Douglas writes in the majority opinion:

"Preachers of the more orthodox faiths are not engaged in commercial undertakings because they are dependent on their calling for a living. Whether needy or affluent, they avail themselves of the constitutional privilege of a 'free exercise' of their religion when they enter the pulpit to proclaim their faith.

The priest or preacher is as fully protected in his function as the parishioners are in their worship. A flat license tax on that constitutional privilege would be as odious as the early 'taxes on knowledge' which the framers of the First Amendment sought to outlaw."

Read More: Follett v. Town of McCormick

User comments

There are no user comments for this item.

Ratings (the higher the better)
Interesting
Comment
    Please enter the security code.
 
 
Powered by JReviews

Today's Major Events

Birth of Emma Goldman, Will Promote Freethought and Anarchism
Archbishop Emidio Taliani Blames Jews for Violence They Experience
McCarren-Walter Immigration Bill Passed Over President Truman's Veto
Joseph Smith and Brother Hyrum Lynched by Mob in Carthage Illinois
Oral Roberts Claims He Can Raise the Dead