Jones v. Opelika II: Supreme Court Strikes Down Fee to Distribute Literature

Jones v. Opelika II: Supreme Court Strikes Down Fee to Distribute Literature

Jones v. Opelika II

Timeline of History

History Topics
Religious History
Countries

Argued: Jones v. Opelika II - The Supreme Court will rule that the practice of charging a flat fee for people distributing literature is unconstitutional. The freedom of press is not to be restricted only to those who can afford to pay the licensing fee.

Justice Douglas will write in the majority opinion:

"The mere fact that the religious literature is 'sold' by itinerant preachers rather than 'donated' does not transform evangelism into a commercial enterprise. If it did, then the passing of the collection plate in church would make the church service a commercial projectT.

A minister who sells religious literature does not immediately become a book agent. Also, the freedom of press should not be restricted only to those who can afford to pay the licensing fee."

User comments

There are no user comments for this item.

Ratings (the higher the better)
Interesting
Comment
    Please enter the security code.
 
 
Powered by JReviews

Today's Major Events

Birth of Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosopher of Logical Positivism
Birth of Marcus Aurelius, Future Roman Emperor and Stoic Philosopher
13-Year-Old Girl Found Molested and Murdered; Jewish Manager Leo Frank Blamed
Birth of Muhammad in Mecca
Hitler Signs Nazi-Vatican Concordat, Puts His Support Behind Eliminating Secular Schools