Jones v. Opelika II: Supreme Court Strikes Down Fee to Distribute Literature

Jones v. Opelika II: Supreme Court Strikes Down Fee to Distribute Literature

Jones v. Opelika II

Timeline of History

History Topics
Religious History
Countries

Argued: Jones v. Opelika II - The Supreme Court will rule that the practice of charging a flat fee for people distributing literature is unconstitutional. The freedom of press is not to be restricted only to those who can afford to pay the licensing fee.

Justice Douglas will write in the majority opinion:

"The mere fact that the religious literature is 'sold' by itinerant preachers rather than 'donated' does not transform evangelism into a commercial enterprise. If it did, then the passing of the collection plate in church would make the church service a commercial projectT.

A minister who sells religious literature does not immediately become a book agent. Also, the freedom of press should not be restricted only to those who can afford to pay the licensing fee."

User comments

There are no user comments for this item.

Ratings (the higher the better)
Interesting
Comment
    Please enter the security code.
 
 
Powered by JReviews

Today's Major Events

Thomas Goode at Virginia Secession Convention: Reason for Secession is Slavery
SS Officer Viktor Brack Writes to Himmler About Mass Sterilization
Leni Riefenstahl's Triumph des Willens (Triumph of the Will) Opens
Stump v. Sparkman: Judge Can't Be Sued for Sterilizing Minor Girl Without Her Consent
Birth of Daniel Dennett, Philosopher and Scientist