Tileston v. Ullman, Poe v. Ullman: Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Case on Contraceptives Hot

Tileston v. Ullman, Poe v. Ullman: Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Case on Contraceptives

Supreme Court Building
Source: Wikipedia

Decided: Tileston v. Ullman & Poe v. Ullman - The U.S. Supreme Court refuses to hear a case on Connecticut laws prohibiting the sale of contraceptives because no one can demonstrate they have been harmed.

It's an important principle of Supreme Court jurisprudence that unless someone can demonstrate harm then there can be no relief offered by the court - and if the court can offer no relief, then there is no real constitutional question for them to decidee. Justice Harlan's dissent in Poe, however, explains why the case should be reviewed and why fundamental privacy interests are at stake.

User comments

There are no user comments for this item.

Ratings (the higher the better)
Interesting
Comment
    Please enter the security code.
 
 
Powered by JReviews

Today's Major Events

Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Law Signed by President Clinton
IBM Wins Contract for Prussian Census, Will Help Make Holocaust Posible
Bishop Michael Rackl Links Being a Good Catholic With Being a Patriotic German
Pope Gregory IX Begins Medieval Inquisition in Aragon
Evacuation of British, French, and Belgian Forces Begins at Dunkirk