Ingraham v. Wright: Court Rules Corporal Punishment in Schools Not Unconstitutional Hot

Ingraham v. Wright: Court Rules Corporal Punishment in Schools Not Unconstitutional

Ingraham v. Wright

Timeline of History

History Topics
Countries

Decided: Ingraham v. Wright — The U.S. Supreme Court rules that corporal punishment in the schools is not unconstitutional. In this case, 14-year-old James Ingraham was held down on a table with Lemmie Deliford, the assistant principal, restraining Ingraham's arms and Solomon Barnes, an assistant to the principal, restraining Ingraham's legs.

Principal Willie J. Wright, Jr. then proceeded to beat Ingraham so severely that he suffered a hematoma and required medical attention. According to the Supreme Court, none of this rose to the level of "cruel and unusual punishment" or loss of liberty.

User comments

There are no user comments for this item.

Ratings (the higher the better)
Interesting
Comment
    Please enter the security code.
 
 
Powered by JReviews

Today's Major Events

Norma McCorvey of Roe v. Wade is Confirmed as Roman Catholic
Louisiana Archbishop Joseph Rummel Gives Speech Defending Racial Integration
Georgia Mob Lynches Jewish Factory Manager for Alleged Sexual Molestation and Murder
Rudolf Hess Commits Suicide by Strangulation in Berlin's Spandau Prison
Governor Marco Bragadin of Famagusta is Gruesomely Executed by Ottoman Turks