Roth v. U.S.: Supreme Court Rules Obscene Material Not Protected by First Amendment

Roth v. U.S.: Supreme Court Rules Obscene Material Not Protected by First Amendment

Roth v. United States

Timeline of History

History Topics
Countries

Argued: Roth v. United States — The U.S. Supreme Court will rule that 'obscene' material is not protected by the First Amendment because freedom of expression does not give people absolute protection for every possible utterance.

From the majority opinion:

"...implicit in the history of the First Amendment is the rejection of obscenity as utterly without redeeming social importance. ...However, sex and obscenity are not synonymous.

Obscene material is material which deals with sex in a manner appealing to prurient interest. The portrayal of sex, e. g., in art, literature and scientific works, is not itself sufficient reason to deny material the constitutional protection of freedom of speech and press. ...

It is therefore vital that the standards for judging obscenity safeguard the protection of freedom of speech and press for material which does not treat sex in a manner appealing to prurient interest."

Read More: Roth v. United States

User comments

There are no user comments for this item.

Ratings (the higher the better)
Interesting
Comment
    Please enter the security code.
 
 
Powered by JReviews

Today's Major Events

ACLU Will Try to Raise $10,000 for Defense of John Scopes for Teaching Evolution
Second Armistice at Compiègne Signed Between Germany and Remains of French Government
Birth of Erich Marie Remarque, Author of All Quiet On The Western Front
Operation Barbarossa, Invasion of Soviet Union, is Launched by Nazi Germany
Vatican Condemns U.S. States Outlawing Discrimination Due to Sexual Orientation